Sheldon
Miller-Embry
English
102
Professor
Paudel
3/3/2015
Research Paper Outline
Intro:
Hook: More and more people are beginning to believe
that athletes in college should receive some form of compensation for playing
sports for their school.
Thesis: Student-athlete compensation should not
be considered because it would take away from the real reason they are in
college which is to get an education to help them succeed in other aspects in
their lives.
Implications: Could
paying student athletes negatively affect the athletes and the university? Could
this improve the athlete’s performance or the university all together in the
long run? How would this change the whole outlook on sports in the U.S. alone?
Background:
· The previous
history of past attempts to pay student athletes.
· Along with all of
the restrictions that surround the NCAA when it comes to athletes receiving any
sort of gift.
· NCAA rules and
regulations along with professional rules and regulations.
· Previous gifts
given to athletes that are against the regulations of NCAA, with what
consequences.
Then:
· More conservative
views would more than likely be against paying these athletes.
· How long have
people proposed the idea of paying student athletes?
· Older NCAA
regulations compared to more up to date regulations regarding this topic.
Now:
· More liberal views
on compensating these athletes.
· How would paying
student athletes change the future of not only collegiate sports but
professional sports as well?
· Analyze financial
issues with student athletes, along with scholarships
· Possible effects
on grades if student athletes were to be paid.
Counter:
· How could paying
athletes have a positive effects?
· Explain other
points of view from others, but do not discourage these views.
· Recap earlier
points
No comments:
Post a Comment